The 1st Annual Forum on the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region

15.10.2010 kl. 17:00
It is a pleasure and a privilege for me to address this distinguished audience on behalf of the BSPC, which is an assembly for parliamentarians from altogether 27 parliaments and parliamentary organizations around the Baltic Sea.

The ample information and lively discussions during this Forum have provided an enriching experience which I am sure will contribute to our joint and combined capacity to deal with the challenges of the Baltic Sea Region.

The EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, based on an initiative by the Baltic Intergroup in the European Parliament, is a welcome companion to the array of strategies, policies and tools to manage the challenges of the Baltic Sea Region. The consultation procedure preceding the adoption of the Strategy was an exemplary exercise in transparency and inclusion.

The structure of cooperation evolving in the Baltic Sea Region is in many ways ground-breaking, with huge potential to deliver results and also serve as best practice and inspiration for other regions.

Allow me to make three short comments on this Forum.

Firstly, I believe that this Forum can be a useful contribution to the evolution of a communality of views on the ways and means of dealing with the challenges of the Baltic Sea Region.

The challenges of the Region transcend institutional and territorial borders, and so the solutions to these challenges must transcend those borders as well.

It is fundamentally important to ensure that all stakeholders of the Region – from EU- as well as non-EU– countries – can participate in the work on an equal footing. We strongly advocate the continuous alignment of the EU Strategy with the Northern Dimension policy, which constitutes a general framework for cooperation between EU, Russia, Norway and Iceland.

The Baltic Sea Region accommodates a multitude of actions, policies and projects aimed at curing the Region’s illnesses and releasing its potentials. The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan, The Baltic Sea Action Summit, and the Baltic Development Forum Summit are three prominent examples.

Different actors have and should pursue different aims and actions. I maintain, however, that we can do better in synchronizing our various activities in order to avoid duplication and boost the collective impact of our efforts. Pragmatic modes of coordination and cooperation should be sought. The designation of the Northern Dimension Partnership in Public Health and Social Well-Being – currently with Russian Chairmanship – as coordinator of the health priority in the Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region is a case in point.

The macroregional concept underpinning the Strategy opens up interesting and promising new opportunities, both for horizontal cooperation between various stakeholders of the region, and for vertical cooperation between different levels of governance. The Strategy and its priority areas can serve as a joint focus, inspiring a macroregional consolidation of efforts and guiding them towards common goals.

There is a need to develop methods for continuous monitoring, assessment and feed-back on the progress of the Strategy, both at Commission level and by all stakeholders.

Secondly, I believe that this Forum has an important role in promoting and providing an overview over the financial resources available for the implementation of strategies.

By and large, it seems like sufficient resources are available, albeit through different funding channels. It is important to bring sharper clarity over the availability of resources, and to use them efficiently. Since the overarching objectives of the major strategies of the Region coincide to some extent, there are synergies that can be harvested in the implementation of strategies. For instance, a project that receives its principal funding through one strategy might very well produce results that are also compliant with the objectives of other, related strategies.

It is also important to widen and facilitate the access to funds for all stakeholders of the Region. The EU Baltic Sea Region Programme 2007-2013, for instance, embraces North-West Russia and Belarus as eligible applicants. This supports a development of projects and approaches which is based on the nature of the challenges, regardless of their geographical distribution, and not on administrative divisions. Co-funding should remain a basic principle.

Money is one resource, skills is another. There is a shortage of bankable projects, meaning coherent, realistic and viable projects to implement plans and programmes. Based on an initiative by parliamentarians of the Region, the Nordic Investment Bank and the Nordic Environment Finance Corporation have launched a Trust Fund to support the development of bankable projects for the implementation of the HELCOM BSAP, which of course also benefits the implementation of the EU Strategy.

Thirdly, I believe that this Forum can serve as a kind of a Town Hall Meeting, where citizens, experts and decision-makers can congregate and exchange opinions and ideas.

A strategy gains credibility both from the sense of participation that citizens experience during its design and its implementation, and from its ability to deliver tangible and positive effects in people’s everyday life.

A sincere and expanded dialogue with citizens, NGOs, civic organizations and others should therefore be an integral part of the implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region.

The local and regional authorities in the region will play an indispensable role for the Strategy and its implementation. Subregional organizations like the BSSSC and UBC – to name but a few – are other important drivers on the ground.

The NGOs play an invaluable role both as opinion-makers and independent experts, and their views, warnings and advice should be taken seriously. They can also be instrumental in keeping citizens informed and involved in the planning and implementation of strategies and projects that influence the development of the Baltic Sea Region.

At the end of the day, the value and success of the Strategy will be judged not by its internal logic, but by its capacity to improve the welfare – in a wide sense – of the citizens of the Region.

In conclusion, we expect that the EU will further develop the interfaces and instruments of the Strategy. We parliamentarians of the Region will continue to exert political pressure on the Governments to provide resources, fulfil all their commitments, and take action for the good of the Region.

This way, we can all contribute to make the Baltic Sea Region sustainable, prosperous, attractive and safe.

Tal under "The 1st Annual Forum on the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region" i Tallinn 15.10.2010

Riksdagsgruppen Riksdagsgruppen

Gruppanföranden

Responsdebatten om om redogörelsen gällande EU:s grundfördrag

Jag vill börja med att göra några saker fullständigt klara. Inom Svenska riksdagsgruppen tror vi på den Europeiska Unionen! Vi är övertygade om att Finland mår bättre, och att vi har klarat oss bättre som medlem i unionen än om vi hade valt att stå utanför. Utan medlemskap i EU hade det varit ännu svårare att övervinna depressio-nen på 1990-talet, sade Astrid Thors.
10.05.2006 kl. 00:00

Interpellationsdebatt om åldringsvården

Vad finns staten till för? Jo, enligt Svenska riksdagsgruppen har statsapparaten till uppgift att träda in i de livsskeden som individen inte klarar sig på egen hand. Därför anser vi att staten skall koncentrera sig på att stöda individen under hennes första och sista år. Finland har ett bra lagstadgat stöd för våra åldringar. Men lagtexten är inte mycket värd om den inte omsätts i praktiken, sade Pehr Löv.
04.05.2006 kl. 00:00

Statsrådets utbildningspolitiska redogörelse

Statsrådets redogörelse är en positiv läsning. För det första är nivån i den finländska utbildningen rätt bra och för det andra har regeringen valt att fördomsfritt sätta fingret på de utmaningar som måste lösas. Hela vårt välstånd bygger i grunden på hur vi löser de utbildningspolitiska utmaningarna. En hög kunskapsnivå blev Finlands räddning under det svåra 90-talet. Så skall det också vara i framtiden, sade Christina Gestrin
02.05.2006 kl. 00:00

Redogörelsen om detaljhandelns struktur och utveckling

Det är rätt vanligt att folk idag beklagar sig över både internationaliseringen och globaliseringen. Ofta framställs dessa som nya och obehagliga fenomen för Finland. Jag frågar mig om man då har glömt sitt eget lands historia och bakgrund, sade Roger Jansson i sitt gruppanförande.
26.04.2006 kl. 00:00

Regeringens budgetramar 2007-2011

Rapporteringen och slutsatserna från regeringens budgetramförhandlingar varierar beroende vem man lyssnar på. Dels har det talat om regeringskris och avgångar, dels om konstruktiva diskussioner. Kontentan är ändå den, att regeringen kom överens om att ge fortsatt stöd till lantbruk och landsbygd också efter att EU-stöden skärs ned. Exakta eurobelopp kan givetvis inte slås fast förrän förhandlingarna med EU avslu-tats. Det är inget nytt i det. Så har vi agerat redan i tolv år.
28.03.2006 kl. 00:00

Regeringens redogörelse om arbetskraftens fria rörlighet inom EU

Jag vill tacka regeringen för en bra redogörelse, men framför allt - en klok slutsats. Det är bra att regeringen driver en fördomsfri och klar politik. Mycket av de hot och risker som framförts i debatten om arbetskraftens rörlighet har handlat mera om skrämselpropaganda än om sakliga argument.
14.03.2006 kl. 00:00

Gruppanförande i interpellationsdebatten om kommunservicen.

"Det är framför allt dags för kommuninvånaren att begära svar av sin kommunledning; Lovar ni att vi klarar oss i trettio år till utan att göra något? Kan min kommun garantera att jag får modern service om tjugo år med dagens strukturer?", sade Eva Biaudet i sitt gruppanförande.
07.03.2006 kl. 00:00